Daily Archives: October 10, 2012

Change our schools, or drug our students?

“I don’t have a whole lot of choice. We’ve decided as a society that it’s too expensive to modify the kid’s environment. So we have to modify the kid.”

– Dr. Michael Anderson, a pediatrician for low-income kids in Georgia on why he prescribes Adderal for ADD/ADHD in spite of his belief the disorder is “made up”

Colleagues, I’ve been simmering on an idea for the past couple of years and this morning when I read   the New York Times article containing the above quote from Dr. Anderson that simmer became a boil. The idea is this: school is so crushingly, cripplingly boring. Kids in desks in rows, bells, hour after hour of listening to an adult talk, whole days without going outside (or seeing daylight in some of the windowless schools I’ve been in!), silence while doing worksheets, silence while taking multiple choice exams, speaking to peers only during passing periods or when the teacher turns away . . . I know it isn’t always like this. Still, even the best teacher who’s classroom is dynamic and learner-centered is only functioning as one small piece of a student’s day.

Our’s is a system unfit for children who “can’t sit still” or “who lack focus” – they must be drugged. I recently re-watched Sir Ken Robinson’s TED talk “Do schools kill creativity?” (if you haven’t seen it, please, please take the next 20 minutes and have a look . . . he is so funny! so substantive!):

Although I am tempted to rant for a page or two about how deeply our students crave creative involvement in meaningful art I will save that reflection for another day. Let’s start for now with the structure of a typical school day.

Two years ago the administration at my school took a chance and let my colleagues and I implement something called Working Wednesday for our senior class. This involved not having regular period classes on Wednesdays and instead creating an individualized schedule for each student according to his or her needs. Some students had an entire day of flexible time during which they could work on independent projects and assignments while others had a carefully crafted schedule full of appointments with various teachers for one-on-one tutoring, college counseling sessions, ACT tutorial, and re-testing for failed exams. We also used Wednesday to visit our local library, conduct field research at a nearby lake and listen to guest speakers.

The additional advantage of a flexible schedule is it lets teachers take turns playing catch up. We would rotate tutorial and monitoring duties in such a way as to allow large blocks of time (way more than our usual hour planning period) to grade and plan. At the end of our first year implementing Working Wednesday we saw huge jumps in our student’s achievement. My students’ performance jumped from 32% passing in 2010-11 to 45% on the college-level IB History exam.

I have heard people say that if Rip Van Winkle awoke today from a 100 year sleep the only thing he would still recognize among the iPads, airplanes, cell phones, and internet connect laptops are schools – because they look and operate almost exactly the same as they did 100 years ago. We cannot afford another 100 years under the same system. We must change our schools and teachers, along with parents, must be the ones who demand the change.

How can we make our schools dynamic places of learning? How can we structure our classrooms so that rule-following and sitting still aren’t the qualities we reward most in our students?

Affirmative Action: “Unfinished Work”

 

The case being argued in front of the Supreme Court today is the result of a lawsuit brought by a white student, Abigail Fisher, who was denied admission to the University of Texas in 2008. That same year a young black woman, Tedra Jacobs, with a similar academic record as Fisher was accepted. My sister-in-law Sarah Garland (who is sitting inside the Supreme Court right now listening to arguments!) has a new article posted over at The Atlantic that looks at Jacobs’ story. She shows how affirmative action can be tremendously helpful as well as explores reasons why it does not always serve as the equalizer it was designed to be (click here to read it).